3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rich & Whillock, Inc. v. Ashton Development, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rich & Whillock, Inc. v. Ashton Development, Inc. Anchor | green | “may come into play upon the doing of a wrongful act which is sufficiently coercive to cause a reasonably prudent person faced with no reasonable alternative to succumb to the perpetrator's pressure.” | 3 |
| 2 | Rich & Whillock, Inc. v. Ashton Development, Inc. | green | “wrongful act which is sufficiently coercive to cause a reasonably prudent person faced with no reasonable alternative to succumb to the perpetrator's pressure.” | 2 |
| 3 | In Re the Marriage of Baltins | green | “the coercion must induce the assent of the coerced party, who has no reasonable alternative to succumbing.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.