2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Estate of Karger.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Estate of Karger Anchor | green | “what the law ought to be is for the legislature; what the law is, rests with the courts.” | 3 |
| 2 | Koep v. Karger | green | “what the law ought to be is for the legislature; what the law is, rests with the courts.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.