2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Son v. Margolius, Mallios, Davis, Rider & Tomar.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Son v. Margolius, Mallios, Davis, Rider & Tomar Anchor | green | “when parties disagree as to the existence or terms of an oral agreement, their conduct and intentions may be employed to determine any ambiguous and unknown provisions of the contract.” | 4 |
| 2 | Ramlall v. Mobilepro Corp. | green | “the construction of an undisputed oral contract is for the court to decide as a matter of law.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.