2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Isabelle v. Department of Employment & Training.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Isabelle v. Department of Employment & Training Anchor | green | “what a reasonable person would have done in the same circumstances.” | 4 |
| 2 | Kasnowski v. Department of Employment Security | green | “a quit for something that is only a future possibility and has not actually yet occurred does not justify the award of benefits.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.