2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Campbell.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Campbell Anchor | green | “when a statute specifies the particular situations in which it is to apply, it should generally be construed as excluding from its operation all other situations not specified.” | 4 |
| 2 | Beinor v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office | green | “a physician does not prescribe marijuana, but may only provide 'written documentation' stating that the patient has a debilitating medical condition and might benefit from the medical use of marijuana.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.