2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Van Kruiningen v. PLAN B, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Van Kruiningen v. PLAN B, LLC Anchor | green | “as a general matter, employment relationships in connecticut are 'at-will' absent a contract to the contrary.” | 4 |
| 2 | Thibodeau v. Design Group One Architects, LLC | green | “looks to see whether the plaintiff has alleged that his discharge violated any explicit statutory or constitutional provision or whether he alleged that his dismissal contravened any judicially conceived notion of public policy.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.