3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 77 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Las Cruces Professional Fire Fighters & International Ass'n of Fire Fighters v. City of Las Cruces.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Las Cruces Professional Fire Fighters & International Ass'n of Fire Fighters v. City of Las Cruces Anchor | green | “the question is not whether substantial evidence exists to support the opposite result, but rather whether such evidence supports the result reached.” | 38 |
| 2 | Landavazo v. Sanchez | green | “substantial evidence is such relevant evidence that a reasonable mind would find adequate to support a conclusion.” | 30 |
| 3 | Aspen Landscaping, Inc. v. Longford Homes of New Mexico, Inc. | green | “all of the evidence, both favorable and unfavorable, followed by an explanation of why the unfavorable evidence does not amount to substantial evidence, such as is necessary to inform both the appellee and the court of the true nature of the appellant's arguments” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.