3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 77 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Craig Zuber v. Boscovs.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Craig Zuber v. Boscovs Anchor | green | “to survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 49 |
| 2 | Michele Curay-Cramer v. The Ursuline Academy Of Wilmington, Delaware, Inc. | green | “unreasonable factual inferences.” | 14 |
| 3 | Alex Taksir v. Vanguard Group | green | “accepts as true all well- pled factual allegations in the complaint and all reasonable inferences that can be drawn from them.” | 14 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.