2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Termination of the Parental Rights of Doe 2009-19.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Termination of the Parental Rights of Doe 2009-19 Anchor | green | “it is not our role to reweigh the evidence.” | 3 |
| 2 | Neustadt v. Colafranceschi | green | “ppellate courts in idaho do not reweigh evidence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.