2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Imapizza, LLC v. At Pizza Ltd..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Imapizza, LLC v. At Pizza Ltd. Anchor | green | “must show that jurisdiction is proper under both (1) the district of columbia's long-arm statute and (2) the u.s. constitution's due process clause.” | 4 |
| 2 | Thompson Hine, LLP v. Elicko Taieb | green | “minimum contacts' between the defendant and the forum 'such that he should reasonably anticipate being haled into court there.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.