2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rivera-Díaz v. Humana Insurance of Puerto Rico, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rivera-Díaz v. Humana Insurance of Puerto Rico, Inc. Anchor | green | “the supreme court has made pellucid 'that in the usual case in which all federal-law claims are eliminated before trial, the balance of factors . . . will point toward declining to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims.” | 4 |
| 2 | Eves v. LePage | green | “a district court 'may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction' if the court 'has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.