2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dulaney v. St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dulaney v. St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Anchor | green | “to avoid summary judgment for the defense in a medical malpractice case, the plaintiff must offer expert testimony indicating that the defendant health care provider negligently failed to meet the applicable standard of health care practice.” | 4 |
| 2 | McDaniel v. Inland Northwest Renal Care Group-Idaho, LLC | neutral | “(1) whether the lower court rightly perceived the issue as one of discretion; (2) whether the court acted within the boundaries of such discretion and consistently with any legal standards applicable to specific choices; and (3) whether the court reached its decision by an exerc…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.