2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Little v. Astrue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Little v. Astrue Anchor | green | “in other words 'a district court's review of the social security administration's findings of fact is limited to whether those findings are supported by substantial evidence.” | 5 |
| 2 | Espinosa v. Astrue | green | “if an alj rejects a treating physician's opinion, the alj bears the burden of explaining why he has rejected the treating physician's opinion and how the doctor's assessment is contradicted by substantial evidence.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.