2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Michael A. Maltese (073584).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Michael A. Maltese (073584) Anchor | green | “if the state can show that 'the information ultimately or inevitably would have been discovered by lawful means . . . the deterrence rationale of the exclusionary rule has so little basis that the evidence should be received.” | 4 |
| 2 | State v. Antoine D. Watts(074556) | green | “opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the feel of the case, which a reviewing court cannot enjoy.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.