2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wright v. City of Poughkeepsie.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wright v. City of Poughkeepsie Anchor | green | “modifications of pendente lite awards should rarely be made by an appellate court and then only under exigent circumstances, such as where a party is unable to meet his or her financial obligations, or justice otherwise requires” | 4 |
| 2 | Kats v. Throop & Gates, Inc. | green | “consequently, any perceived inequities in pendente lite maintenance and child support can best be remedied by a speedy trial, at which the parties' financial circumstances can be fully explored” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.