2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Curry v. Advocate Bethany Hospital.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Curry v. Advocate Bethany Hospital Anchor | green | “the district court properly dismissed the pendant state-law tort claims without prejudice because the federal claims were dismissed at screening.” | 4 |
| 2 | Hagan v. Quinn | green | “when all federal claims in a suit in federal court are dismissed before trial, the presumption is that the court will relinquish federal jurisdiction over any supplemental state-law claims, which the plaintiff can then prosecute in state court.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.