3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mullen v. Meredith Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mullen v. Meredith Corp. Anchor | green | “in the light most favorable to plaintiffs.” | 3 |
| 2 | Handy v. Lane County | green | “2001 are relevant, at most, only for their persuasive value.” | 2 |
| 3 | Neumann v. Liles | green | “in connection with a public issue or an issue of public interest.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.