2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Javier Mayorga v. Christine A. Merdon.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Javier Mayorga v. Christine A. Merdon Anchor | green | “factual disputes that are 'irrelevant or unnecessary' do not affect the summary judgment determination.” | 4 |
| 2 | Debra Stoe v. William Barr | green | “in considering a motion for summary judgment, judges must ask themselves not whether they think 'the evidence unmistakably favors one side or the other but whether a fair-minded jury could return a verdict for the plaintiff on the evidence presented,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.