2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re the Recall of Reed.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re the Recall of Reed Anchor | neutral | “knows of identifiable facts that support the charge.” | 4 |
| 2 | In re the Recall of Washam | green | “we do not consider claims insufficiently argued by the parties” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.