10 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 76 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Renne v. Geary.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Renne v. Geary Anchor | green | “unless the contrary appears affirmatively from the record.” | 13 |
| 2 | Smith v. United States Court of Appeals, for the Tenth Circuit | green | “standing is determined as of the time the action is brought.” | 10 |
| 3 | Finstuen v. Crutcher | green | “prudential standing is not jurisdictional in the same sense as article iii standing.” | 9 |
| 4 | PROTOCOLS, LLC v. Leavitt | green | “(1) an injury in fact that is both concrete and particularized as well as actual or imminent; (2) a causal relationship between the injury and the challenged conduct; and (3) a likelihood that the injury would be redressed by a favorable decision.” | 9 |
| 5 | Wyoming Ex Rel. Crank v. United States | green | “in general, this inquiry seeks to determine 'whether the plaintiff has such a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy as to assure that concrete adverseness which sharpens the presentation of issues upon which the court so largely depends for illumination.” | 8 |
| 6 | Board of County Commissioners v. Geringer | green | “a judicially-created set of principles that, like constitutional standing, places limits on the class of persons who may invoke the courts' decisional and remedial powers.” | 6 |
| 7 | San Juan County, Utah v. United States | green | “a suit does not present a case or controversy unless the plaintiff satisfies the requirements of article iii standing.” | 6 |
| 8 | San Juan County, Utah v. United States | green | “article iii of the constitution limits the jurisdiction of federal courts to cases and controversies.” | 6 |
| 9 | Board of County Commissioners v. Geringer | green | “a plaintiffs grievance must arguably fall within the zone of interests protected or regulated by the statutory provision or constitutional guarantee invoked in the suit.” | 5 |
| 10 | Habecker v. Town of Estes Park, Colo. | green | “the supreme court recognizes a set of 'prudential' standing concerns that may prevent judicial resolution of a case even where constitutional standing exists” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.