2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Salerno v. Salerno.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Salerno v. Salerno Anchor | green | “the determination of the trial court, which heard and observed the witnesses, is entitled to great deference and should not be disturbed where, as here, it had a sound and substantial basis in the record” | 4 |
| 2 | Brzozowski v. Brzozowski | green | “while possibly never taking effect, impermissibly purports to alter the parties' custodial arrangement automatically upon the happening of a specified future event without taking into account the children's best interests at that time” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.