2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Mojica.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Mojica Anchor | green | “need not always be premised upon the performance of field sobriety tests or any specific number of such tests” | 4 |
| 2 | People v. Mathis | green | “a temporary roadside detention pursuant to a routine traffic stop is not custodial within the meaning of miranda v. arizona ,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.