2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Suphankomut v. Chi-Teh Yu.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Suphankomut v. Chi-Teh Yu Anchor | green | “a material fact in the certificate of readiness was incorrect” | 4 |
| 2 | Strauss v. Vladeck | green | “it is well settled that the court has broad discretion to determine motions under cplr 3126 and that the dismissal sanction is considered a harsh remedy” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.