3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cutrone v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cutrone v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. Anchor | green | “show that it appears to a 'reasonable probability' that the aggregate claims of the plaintiff class are in excess of 5 million.” | 3 |
| 2 | Hart v. Rick's NY Cabaret International, Inc. | green | “a rebuttable presumption that the face of the complaint is a good faith representation of the actual amount in controversy.” | 2 |
| 3 | Hart v. Rick's NY Cabaret International, Inc. | green | “in satisfying the 'reasonable probability' burden, 'there is a rebuttable presumption that the face of the complaint is a good faith representation of the actual amount in controversy.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.