2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bateman v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bateman v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. Anchor | green | “make the major policy change of adopting the market share theory.” | 3 |
| 2 | Fricke v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. | green | “we cannot abandon general rule of products liability requiring identification of the product with the manufacturer” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.