2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bolin v. Sears, Roebuck & Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bolin v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. Anchor | green | “refunding overcharges pursuant to a standard formula also may not require calculating the damages of each class member” | 3 |
| 2 | Ozie Bowen, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. First Family Financial Services, Inc. | green | “alleges facts from which it appears there is a substantial likelihood that he will suffer injury in the future.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.