3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 76 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Steven Hill v. City of Chicago.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Steven Hill v. City of Chicago Anchor | green | “accept all well-pleaded facts as true and draw reasonable inferences in the plaintiff's favor.” | 39 |
| 2 | Steven Hill v. City of Chicago | green | “a claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” | 30 |
| 3 | Reynolds v. CB Sports Bar, Inc. | green | “the 'complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.