Topic: substantially overbroad, that is, its application would be … · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #43193

2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Agan v. Vaughn.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Agan v. Vaughn Anchor
ca11 · 1997
green “substantially overbroad, that is, its application would be unconstitutional in a substantial proportion of cases.” 3
2 American Booksellers v. James Webb
ca11 · 1990
green “results when lawmakers define the scope of a statute to reach both unprotected expression as well as, at least potentially, protected speech.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check