7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 443 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Whirlpool Corp. v. Ziebert.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whirlpool Corp. v. Ziebert Anchor | green | “if possible, a court should interpret a contract so that all parts are given meaning.” | 65 |
| 2 | American States Insurance Co. v. Kiger | green | “rather than place them in con- flict.” | 63 |
| 3 | Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Moore & Associates, Inc. | green | “an insurance contract must be interpreted fairly and reasonably, giving the lan- guage its usual and ordinary meaning.” | 63 |
| 4 | Olmsted Medical Center v. Continental Casualty Company | green | “effect on the underly- ing property.” | 63 |
| 5 | Olmsted Medical Center v. Continental Casualty Company | green | “were permanent absent some intervention.” | 63 |
| 6 | Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Company | green | “means persistent destruction or deprivation, in whole or in part, with a causal nexus to a physical event or condition.” | 63 |
| 7 | Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Company | green | “a distinct, demonstrable, physical change to property.” | 63 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.