2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Calderon v. Ashmus.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Calderon v. Ashmus Anchor | green | “while the eleventh amendment is jurisdictional in the sense that it is a limitation on the federal court's judicial power, ... we have recognized that it is not coextensive with the limitations on judicial power in article iii.” | 3 |
| 2 | James W. Childs v. Margery B. Koosed, Richard L. Aynes, Isaac C. Hunt, William D. Rich, Frank Marini, and William v. Muse | green | “in view of the district court's disposition of the claims on eleventh amendment grounds, the district court was without jurisdiction to make the alternative ruling on the merits.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.