2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lockard v. Pizza Hut, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lockard v. Pizza Hut, Inc. Anchor | green | “an employer who condones or tolerates the creation of a hostile work environment should be held liable.” | 3 |
| 2 | Hollins v. Delta Airlines | green | “the negligence theory, under which the employer fails to remedy a hostile work environment it knew or should have known about; the actual authority theory, under which an employee harasses another employee within the scope of his employment; or the apparent authority theory, und…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.