2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Guzman Rivera v. Rivera Cruz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guzman Rivera v. Rivera Cruz Anchor | green | “we are left to wonder why absolute immunity was originally pled as a defense, abandoned in the initial appeal, and then resurrected as an emergency on remand.” | 3 |
| 2 | George E. Apostol v. Mark Gallion, John Auriemma v. Fred Rice, and City of Chicago | green | “defendants may seek to stall because they gain from delay at plaintiffs' expense, an incentive yielding unjustified appeals.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.