8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 76 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Moreno.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Moreno Anchor | green | “(1) the length of the delay; (2) the reasons for the delay; (3) the appellant's assertion of the right to timely review and appeal; and (4) prejudice.” | 51 |
| 2 | United States v. Hester | green | “basic to alleging and proving a punishable offense is the existence and identification of a wrongful act or acts that meet the requirements of either or both of the clauses of article 134.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Vaughan | green | “it is certainly true that a word of criminality such as 'wrongfully' is essential to an adequate specification.” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Davis | green | “the 'wrongfulness' of the conduct consisted of its threat to good order and discipline and its discredit to the armed forces,” | 4 |
| 5 | United States v. Ballan | green | “from nothing beyond allegations of the act or failure to act itself.” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Davis | green | “the particular facts and surrounding circumstances recited in the specifications which included the specific locations of the charged conduct in this case describe conduct on a military installation which virtually always would be prejudicial to good order and discipline and dis…” | 3 |
| 7 | United States v. Nygren | green | “in violation of section 125.07 of the wisconsin statutes.” | 3 |
| 8 | United States v. Daly | green | “it is certainly true that a word of criminality such as 'wrongfully' is essential to an adequate specification.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.