2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission Anchor | green | “the resolution of highly complex technological issues such as these was entrusted by congress to the agency and not to the courts.” | 3 |
| 2 | The City Of New York v. The United States Department Of Transportation | green | “the fact that effects are only a possibility does not insulate the proposed action from consideration under nepa, but it does accord an agency some latitude in determining whether the risk is sufficient to require preparation of an eis.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.