2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Edward J. Ahrens.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Edward J. Ahrens Anchor | green | “the form is considered highly probative evidence that the notice of deficiency was sent to the addresses specified.” | 3 |
| 2 | Coleman v. Commissioner | green | “the form is considered highly probative evidence that the notice of deficiency was sent to the addresses specified.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.