2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Edward Sinclair Williams.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Edward Sinclair Williams Anchor | green | “the intended meaning of a question and answer are matters for the jury to decide” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Denzil W. Robbins | green | “absent fundamental ambiguity or imprecision in the questioning, the meaning and truthfulness of a declarant's answer is for the jury” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.