2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from M.A.P. Oil Company, Inc. v. Texaco Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M.A.P. Oil Company, Inc. v. Texaco Inc. Anchor | green | “can be broadly characterized in terms of the 'cross-elasticity of demand' for or 'reasonable interchangeability' of a given set of products or services.” | 3 |
| 2 | Weber v. National Football League | green | “should be defined by the demand for the domain names 'jets.com' and 'dolphins.com.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.