3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 62 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bates v. Colvin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bates v. Colvin Anchor | green | “we will uphold the commissioner's final decision if the alj applied the correct legal standards and supported her decision with substantial evidence.” | 45 |
| 2 | Staggs v. Astrue | green | “finding that the medical record omitted from review provided 'significant substantive evidence' regarding the claimant's medical impairments and that any medical opinion rendered without taking this record into consideration was 'incomplete and ineffective” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.