2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Howell v. New York Post Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Howell v. New York Post Co. Anchor | green | “in practice, courts have tended to focus on the outrageousness element, the one most susceptible to determination as a matter of law.” | 3 |
| 2 | Ibraheem v. Wackenhut Services, Inc. | green | “in new york, the tort of iied is extremely disfavored.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.