2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jesse Forrestal, Etc. v. Henry G. Magendantz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jesse Forrestal, Etc. v. Henry G. Magendantz Anchor | green | “to depart from neutrality and decide the case on the basis of personal interest and bias rather than on the evidence,” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Ramon Alfredo Abreu, A/K/A Carlos Juan | green | “is not an inappropriate invocation of the” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.