2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Richard Marx, Individually and Kristina Marx, a Minor v. Glenn H. Gumbinner, Bruce H. Colton and Pamela J. Roebuck.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richard Marx, Individually and Kristina Marx, a Minor v. Glenn H. Gumbinner, Bruce H. Colton and Pamela J. Roebuck Anchor | green | “the district court may exercise its inherent power to narrow the issues for trial and require the plaintiff to state with more specificity the factual allegations supporting the claim” | 3 |
| 2 | James W. Mensh, Bennie P. Mensh v. R.A. Dyer, M.G. Tsoleas, Jr., C.M. Chidester, Jr., and Ted Banholzer, Gerald C. Fayed | green | “could have believed that their actions were lawful in light of both clearly established law and the information the officers possessed at the time.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.