2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Geronimo Muniz-Melchor.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Geronimo Muniz-Melchor Anchor | green | “the law does not require the police to ignore evidence of other crimes in conducting legitimate roadblocks.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Espinoza-Santill | green | “an agent can, and should be, very vigilant in trying to ferret out illegal activity within the confines of the law.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.