2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Gordon R. Tatum, Jr..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Gordon R. Tatum, Jr. Anchor | green | “that are clearly suggested by the circumstances” | 3 |
| 2 | Mickens v. Greene | green | “here, saunders' silence and state law requirements for secrecy of juvenile court records operated together to preclude mickens from raising the conflict of interest claims in his state habeas petition.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.