2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Harriscom Svenska Ab v. Harris Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harriscom Svenska Ab v. Harris Corporation Anchor | green | “committed to the discretion of the district court.” | 3 |
| 2 | Fox v. Bank Mandiri (In Re Perry H. Koplik & Sons, Inc.) | green | “the party seeking an interlocutory appeal has the burden of showing these 'exceptional circumstances' to 'overcome the general aversion to piecemeal litigation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.