2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Scott Savage v. E. Gee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scott Savage v. E. Gee Anchor | green | “actual present harm or a significant possibility of future harm.” | 4 |
| 2 | Julious Mosley v. City of Wickliffe | green | “actual cases and controversies” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.