2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Bilal Hamid Ali.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Bilal Hamid Ali Anchor | green | “was free to reject the agreement, and clearly negotiated with the government over its terms.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Irwin A. Dillard | green | “is of questionable relevance to the bradley holding.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.