2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Elizabeth L. Henley v. Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services Kessler, Dr., Commissioner of Food and Drug United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Elizabeth L. Henley v. Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services Kessler, Dr., Commissioner of Food and Drug United States Anchor | green | “an agency action may be deemed arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of discretion 'if the agency has relied on factors which congress has not intended it to consider, entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem, offered an explanation for its decision that runs c…” | 3 |
| 2 | International Internship Programs v. Napolitano | green | “review of final agency action under the apa is highly deferential.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.