2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Damien Hill.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Damien Hill Anchor | green | “there is enough evidence to permit a rational jury to conclude that he was guilty of it.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Abraham Hernandez | green | “where no reasonable person could take the view adopted by the trial court.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.