2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Marroquin-Manriguez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marroquin-Manriguez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service Anchor | green | “the court's method of analysis in turner elkhorn mining represents a fundamental shift from that employed in alton railroad.” | 3 |
| 2 | Miner v. Brackney | green | “the court's method of analysis in turner elkhorn mining represents a fundamental shift from that employed in alton railroad.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.