green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
9.2 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, last quoted 1997 · 2 courts ·
…the court's method of analysis in turner elkhorn mining represents a fundamental shift from that employed in alton railroad.
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bellaire Corp. v. Shalala
the court's method of analysis in turner elkhorn mining represents a fundamental shift from that employed in alton railroad.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
LTV Steel Co. v. Shalala
the court's method of analysis in turner elkhorn mining represents a fundamental shift from that employed in alton railroad.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Chateaugay Corporation
the court's method of analysis in turner elkhorn mining represents a fundamental shift from that employed in alton railroad.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Penn Advertising of Baltimore, Inc. v. Mayor of Baltimore
we hold that sufficient reason exists to believe that advertising and consumption are linked to justify the ban , whether or not 'concrete scientific evidence' exists to that effect.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
McDonald v. Centra
mppaa ... protects the interlocking interests of the pbgc, the premium payers, the withdrawing employers and the vested employees.
discussed
Cited "see"
Walter Garrett v. L. Clarke, Sgt. D. Epps, 144 F. West, Maj. 63 Pinelawn Police Department City of Pinelawn
(2×)
See Miner v. Brackney, 719 F.2d 954, 956 (8th Cir.1983) (per curiam), cert. denied, 467 *747 U.S. 1259, 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 856 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bd. of Educ. of Carlsbad v. Harrell
(2×)
See Textile Workers Pension Fund v. Standard Dye & Finishing Co., 725 F.2d 843, 855 (2d Cir.) (where party in compulsory, binding arbitration “may come to the district court to enforce, vacate or modify an arbitrator’s award, [the party] is not denied meaningful access to the courts”), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 856 (1984); State Farm Mut.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ross
State v. McCarthy, 197 Conn. 247, 260 , 496 A.2d 513 (1985); see People v. Garcia, 97 Ill. 2d 58, 87-88 , 454 N.E.2d 274 (1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1260 , 104 S. Ct. 3555 , 82 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Biddison v. City Of Chicago
See Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 , 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989) 2 The ripeness doctrine is used by federal courts to "enforce prudential limitations upon their jurisdiction." Peick v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 724 F.2d 1247, 1261 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ruiz v. Commissioner of the Department of Transportation
(2×)
Accord Textile Workers Pension Fund v. Standard Dye & Finishing Co., 725 F.2d 843, 855 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 856 (1984). *896 Plaintiffs do not challenge the clarity of the language in former section 211(10) itself.
discussed
Cited "see"
The Barbizon Corporation v. Ilgwu National Retirement Fund, Sol C. Chaikin and Joseph Moore, Defendants
Ill 1985); see generally Peick v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 724 F.2d 1247, 1255-56 (7th Cir.1983) (describing MPPAA and its effect on prior ERISA requirements), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. 888 Corporation
See Peick v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 724 F.2d 1247, 1256 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984) 3 Section 558 provides in relevant part: Elimination of Retroactive Application of Amendments Made by Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980. (a) In general.-- (1) Liability.--Any withdrawal liability incurred by an employer pursuant to part 1 of subtitle E of title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1381 et seq.) as a result of the complete or partial withdrawal of such employer from a multiemployer p…
cited
Cited "see"
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. 888 Corp.
See Peick v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 724 F.2d 1247, 1256 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Robbins v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.
(2×)
See Republic Industries, Inc. v. Teamsters Joint Council No. 83, 718 F.2d 628 , 640 n. 13 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 856 (1984); Board of Trustees of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund v. Thompson Building Materials, Inc., 749 F.2d 1396, 1403-04 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 2116 , 85 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin v. Sargent
(2×)
See Miner v. Brackney, 719 F.2d 954, 956 (8th Cir.1983) (per curiam), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 856 (1984); Carter v. Romines, 560 F.2d 395, 395 (8th Cir.1977) (per curiam), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 948 , 98 S.Ct. 2854 , 56 L.Ed.2d 790 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin v. Sargent
(2×)
See Miner v. Brackney, 719 F.2d 954, 956 (8th Cir.1983) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 856 (1984); Carter v. Romines, 560 F.2d 395, 395 (8th Cir.1977) (per cu-riam), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 948 , 98 S.Ct. 2854 , 56 L.Ed.2d 790 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
A. Soloff & Son, Inc. v. Asher
(2×)
See Textile Workers Pension Fund v. Standard Dye & Finishing Co., Inc., 725 F.2d 843, 857-58 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 856 (1984); see also Fur Manufacturing Industry Retirement Fund v. Lazar-Wisotzky, Inc., 550 F.Supp. 35 , 3 Empl.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harrison v. State
See Dunagin v. City of Oxford, Miss., 489 F.Supp. 763 , 771-72 n. 11 (N.D.Miss.1980), aff'd 718 F.2d 738 (5th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984); Felix v. Milliken, 463 F.Supp. 1360, 1371-72 (E.D.Mich.1978); Republican College Council of Pennsylvania v. Winner, 357 F.Supp. 739, 740 (E.D.Pa.1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Local 638 ... Local 28 of the Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n
See also Arthur v. Nyquist, 712 F.2d 816, 823 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3555 , 82 L.Ed.2d 856 (1984) (upholding proportional layoff); Morgan v. O’Bryant, 671 F.2d 23 , 28 (1st Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 881 , 103 S.Ct. 178 , 74 L.Ed.2d 146 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Advertising Company v. Town Of Babylon
See, e.g., Dunagin v. City of Oxford, 718 F.2d 738 , 748 n. 8 (5th Cir.1983) (en banc) ("the decision on whether a regulation of commercial speech directly advances the state's interest ... is an exercise of constitutional adjudication wherein appellate courts play a special role"), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984). 16 While acknowledging that substantial governmental interests exist in the promotion of aesthetics and traffic safety, the Eleventh Circuit in Dills v. City of Marietta, 674 F.2d 1377 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 905 , 103 S.Ct. 1873 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Advertising Co. v. Town of Babylon
See, e.g., Dunagin v. City of Oxford, 718 F.2d 738 , 748 n. 8 (5th Cir.1983) (en banc) (“the decision on whether a regulation of commercial speech directly advances the state’s interest ... is an exercise of constitutional adjudication wherein appellate courts play a special role”), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Loran W. Robbins v. Lady Baltimore Foods, Inc.
See, e.g., Peick v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 724 F.2d 1247, 1251-56 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Offet v. Solem
(2×)
Compare White v. Bloom, 621 F.2d 276 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 995 , 101 S.Ct. 533 , 66 L.Ed.2d 292 (1980) and cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1089 , 101 S.Ct. 882 , 66 L.Ed.2d 816 (1981) and Kelsey v. State of Minnesota, 565 F.2d 503 (8th Cir.1977) (permitting adjudication of damages claims) with Miner v. Brackney, 719 F.2d 954 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 856 (1984) and Franklin v. Webb, 653 F.2d 362 (8th Cir.1981) (requiring exhaustion of state proceedings before adjudicating damages claims). 1 Accordingly, we approach this case as one in whi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Offet v. Solem
(2×)
Compare White v. Bloom, 621 F.2d 276 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 995 , 101 S.Ct. 533 , 66 L.Ed.2d 292 (1980) and cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1089 , 101 S.Ct. 882 , 66 L.Ed.2d 816 (1981) and Kelsey v. State of Minnesota, 565 F.2d 503 (8th Cir.1977) (permitting adjudication of damages claims) with Miner v. Brackney, 719 F.2d 954 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 856 (1984) and Franklin v. Webb, 653 F.2d 362 (8th Cir.1981) (requiring exhaustion of state proceedings before adjudicating damages claims). 1 Accordingly, we approach this case as one in whi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trustees of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund v. Geltman Industries, Inc.
(2×)
See also Textile Workers Pension v. Standard Dye & Finishing, 725 F.2d 843 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 856 (1984); Trustees of Retirement Fund v. Lazar-Wisotzky, Inc., 550 F.Supp. 35, 38 (S.D.N.Y.1982), affid, 738 F.2d 419 (2d Cir. 1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trustees of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund v. Geltman Industries, Inc.
(2×)
See also Textile Workers Pension v. Standard Dye & Finishing, 725 F.2d 843 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 856 (1984); Trustees of Retirement Fund v. Lazar-Wisotzky, Inc., 550 F.Supp. 35, 38 (S.D.N.Y.1982), aff'd, 738 F.2d 419 (2d Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lads Trucking Company v. Board of Trustees of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund v. Lads Trucking Co.
(2×)
See also Textile Workers Pension v. Standard Dye & Finishing, 725 F.2d 843 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 856 (1984); Trustees of Retirement Fund v. Lazar-Wisotzky ( 550 F.Supp. 35, 38 (S.D.N.Y.1982), aff'd, 738 F.2d 419 (2d Cir.1984); Combs v. Manor Mines, Inc., --- F.Supp. ----, 5 EBC 1475 (D.D.C.1984). 29 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lads Trucking Co. v. Board of Trustees
(2×)
See also Textile Workers Pension v. Standard Dye & Finishing, 725 F.2d 843 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 856 (1984); Trustees of Retirement Fund v. Lazar-Wisotzky ( 550 F.Supp. 35, 38 (S.D.N.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Miner
v.
Brackney
v.
Brackney
No. 83-6467.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 25, 1984.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.